A Three‐Component Reaction for Diversity‐Oriented Synthesis of Polysubstituted Piperidines: Solution and Solid‐Phase Optimization of the First Tandem Aza[4+2]/Allylboration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes the design and optimization of a simple three-component aza[4+2]/allylboration reaction to access polysubstituted alpha-hydroxyalkyl piperidines in a highly diastereocontrolled fashion from maleimides, 4-boronohydrazonodienes, and aldehydes. The aldehyde component does not interfere with the first aza[4+2] step, and it was found that this tandem reaction provides better yields of piperidine products 5 when carried out in one-pot. The required 4-borono-hydrazonodienes 1 are synthesized efficiently from the condensation of 3-boronoacrolein pinacol ester (4) with hydrazines. Overall, the three-component process using N-substituted maleimides as dienophiles produces four stereogenic centers and is quite general. It tolerates the use of a wide variety of aldehydes and hydrazine precursors with different electronic and steric characteristics. By allowing such a wide substrate scope and up to four elements of diversity, this reaction process is particularly well adapted towards applications in diversity-oriented synthesis of polysubstituted piperidine derivatives. The suitability of the aza[4+2]/allylboration reaction for use in solid-phase chemistry was also demonstrated using a N-arylmaleidobenzoic acid functionalized resin. This novel multicomponent reaction thus offers a high level of stereocontrol and versatility in the preparation of densely functionalized nitrogen heterocycles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".