Determination of <i>N</i> -Desmethyl- and <i>N</i> -Bisdesmethyl Metabolites of Sibutramine in Doping Control Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since January 2006, the list of prohibited substances established by the World Anti-Doping Agency includes the antidepressant / anti-obesity drug Sibutramine. Due to its rapid degradation to its active metabolites N-desmethyl and N-bisdesmethyl Sibutramine, reference compounds were synthesized and included into an existing screening assay to allow the unambiguous determination of these metabolic products in human urine using liquid-liquid extraction followed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Characteristic product ions, obtained after electrospray ionization and collision-induced dissociation, were elucidated using high resolution/high accuracy mass measurements with a hybrid linear ion trap/orbitrap mass analyzer. Based on diagnostic product ions, the extended screening procedure was validated for both Sibutramine metabolites using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Items such as lower limits of detection (6-40 ng mL(-1)), recoveries (39-42%), intraday precision (low: 5.5-10.6%, medium: 4.9-5.9%), high: 12.8-16.4%) and interday precision (low: 15.0-22.8%, medium: 17.7-18.6%), high: 16.5-25.6%) were evaluated, and a clinical spot urine sample was analyzed to demonstrate the applicability of the developed assay in sports drug testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it