Transplantation of labeled periodontal ligament cells promotes regeneration of alveolar bone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regeneration of damaged periodontal tissues is mediated by periodontal cells, but a major sub-population comprises highly differentiated cells that do not renew. To overcome the loss of specialized cell types caused by disease, various therapeutic approaches including cell transplants have been developed to promote cell re-population in periodontal tissues. As previous transplantation studies used unlabeled cells, that are indistinguishable from host cells, it has been difficult to assess the contributions of transplanted cells to the healing processes. To track the fate and differentiation of rat periodontal cells transplanted into periodontal wounds, we used collagen-coated fluorescent beads as a permanent endocytosed marker, or cells constitutively expressing beta-galactosidase. We assessed osteogenic cell differentiation with immunohistochemical staining for osteopontin and bone sialoprotein. Cells were transplanted into periodontal wounds created in Sprague--Dawley male rats that are null for beta-galactosidase. Defects were allowed to heal spontaneously (controls), or were closed with collagen implants mixed with beta-galactosidase-positive (Lac-Z) periodontal cells, or closed with collagen implants mixed with periodontal cells loaded with fluorescent beads. Animals were killed at 1 and 2 weeks after surgery and tissues were prepared for morphometric assessment and immunostaining for osteopontin (OPN) and bone sialoprotein (BSP). Transplanted cells were easily distinguished by fluorescent beads or by beta-galactosidase-positive expression and were distributed throughout the regenerating periodontal ligament (PL) and alveolar bone. At 1 week after wounding, animals treated with beta-galactosidase-positive cells exhibited a slightly higher percentage of labeled cells in the PL compared with the fluorescent bead-labeled cell implant group (2% vs. 1% respectively; P > 0.2). At Week 2 percentages of labeled cells were slightly increased in the regenerating PL (approximately 3% for both groups, P > 0.2). In regenerating alveolar bone at 1 week, animals that were treated with beta-galactosidase-positive cells and fluorescent bead-loaded cells exhibited approximately 30% and 25% of labeled cells respectively. At 2 weeks after wounding there was an increase in the percentage of transplanted beta-galactosidase-positive cells (approximately 39% at week 2; P < 0.05), but not of transplanted cells with fluorescent beads (approximately 25% at week 2). In sites with transplanted cells there were higher percentages of OPN positive and BSP positive cells in nascent bone and more newly formed bone than in controls (>40%; P < 0.05). Transplantation of beta-galactosidase-positive cells or cells loaded with fluorescent beads is a useful method for assessing the fate and differentiation of periodontal cells in vivo. Fluorescent beads, however, are diluted at mitosis and this method underestimates the percentage of transplanted cells. As transplanted periodontal cells in both groups promoted regeneration of alveolar bone, cell transplantation could improve the restoration of periodontium destroyed by periodontitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".