MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The roles of Dippu-allatostatin in the modulation of hormone release in Locusta migratoria

2008· article· en· W1983622035 on OpenAlexafffund
Lisa J. Clark, Angela B. Lange, J.R. Zhang, Stephen S. Tobe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Insect Physiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Celiac Association
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProctolinBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyCorpus allatumAdipokinetic hormoneNeuropeptideJuvenile hormoneForskolinLocustAcrididaeHormoneReceptorStimulationBiochemistryOrthoptera

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dippu-allatostatins (ASTs) have pleiotropic effects in Locusta migratoria. Dippu-ASTs act as releasing factors for adipokinetic hormone I (AKH I) from the corpus cardiacum (CC) and also alter juvenile hormone (JH) biosynthesis and release from the corpus allatum (CA). Dippu-AST-like immunoreactivity is found within lateral neurosecretory cells (LNCs) of the brain and axons within the paired nervi corporis cardiaci II (NCC II) to the CC and the CA, where there are extensive processes and nerve endings over both of these neuroendocrine organs. There was co-localization of Dippu-AST-like and proctolin-like immunoreactivity within these regions. Dippu-ASTs increase the release of AKH I in a dose-dependent manner, with thresholds below 10(-11)M (Dippu-AST 7) and between 10(-13) and 10(-12)M (Dippu-AST 2). Both proctolin and Dippu-AST 2 caused an increase in the cAMP content of the glandular lobe of the CC. Dippu-AST 2 also altered the release of JH from the locust CA, but this effect depended on the concentration of peptide and the basal release rates of the CA. These physiological effects for Dippu-ASTs in Locusta have not been shown previously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Insect PhysiologySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207