Bibliographic record
Abstract
The six articles immediately following this introduction are based on papers presented at the 'Canada Abroad' conference held at the Bader International Study Centre, or BISC, at Herstmonceux Castle in Sussex, England, in the summer of 2013. For those who don't know about BISC, it's an interna- tional study centre affiliated with Queen's University - not the Belfast institution, but the Canadian one, based in Kingston, Ontario. It offers an opportunit y for Canadian students, mostly from Queen's but also from other Canadian universities, as well as students from a number of other countries (most notably, but not restricted to, China, Japan, Korea and the United States), to spend one or two terms taking university courses at a little piece of Canada nestling in the Sussex countr yside.At the same time, many of the faculty members are themselves represent- atives of Canada ... abroad. Some are at Herstmonceux more or less permanently - Canadian citizens who have, for var ying reasons, gained employment in more-or-less permanent positions in this educational establishment on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean. Other Canadians abroad here are temporar y visitors, from Queen's or other associated institutions, who spend a term at BISC as visiting professors or visiting fellows, contributing to the teaching and/or research profile of the Centre.The Bader International Study Centre is, in other words, a concrete manifestation of the concept of 'Canada Abroad'. It takes Canadian students and faculty, along with students from elsewhere in the world, and sets them down in foreign parts, forcing them to learn at least something about the world outside that in which they have been born, and often comfortably raised, and rarely challenged with respect to their assumptions, their values and their day-to-day behaviours.Hence, when a number of permanent and visiting faculty members sat down with Bruce Stanley, the new Executive Director of BISC, in the Fall of 2011 to talk about a theme and a title for a conference to be held at Herstmonceux in summer 2013, the notion of 'Canada Abroad', in its multiple manifestations and connotations, was quickly approved. After nearly two years of planning, the conference took place in late July (29 July-1 August) 2013. Over two days of active discussion, plus some necessary and productive social time, 35 papers and two plenar y sessions examined multiple perspectives on the central theme of the conference. Paper presenters and panel participants addressed such issues as Canada's participation in the two World Wars; Canada's changing roles as an actor in international relations; Canadian involvement in international sporting events and the uses of sport in international diplomacy; the changing relationship between foreign policy and the use of Canadian studies as an educational objective supported by the Canadian government; the pedagogical and organisational challenges faced by the faculty and adminis- trators of 'Study Abroad' programmes; Canadian writers or artists whose careers were significantly formed or represented by their time abroad; the role of Canadian arts and culture in forming or changing perceptions of Canada in the outside world.The idea of 'Canada Abroad' makes little sense historically until there developed a concept of 'Canada' as an autonomous actor, independent of its status as British colony. That, of course, was a product of Canada's extraor- dinary contribution to Britain's war effort in the First World War. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.152 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".