MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983708816 · doi:10.1002/ddr.10285

Syntheses, calcium channel modulation effects, and nitric oxide release studies of <i>O</i><sup>2</sup>‐alkyl‐1‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl) diazen‐1‐ium‐1,2‐diolate 4‐aryl(heteroaryl)‐1,4‐dihydro‐2,6‐dimethyl‐3‐nitropyridine‐5‐carboxylates

2003· article· en· W1983708816 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Velázquez, Dean Vo, Edward E. Knaus

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Development Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySubstituentMoietyAlkylArylStereochemistryCalcium channelMedicinal chemistryCalciumOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A group of racemic 4‐aryl(heteroary)‐1,4‐dihydro‐2,6‐dimethyl‐3‐nitropyridine‐5‐carboxy‐lates possessing a potential nitric oxide donor C‐5 O2‐alkyl‐1‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)diazen‐1‐ium‐1,2‐diolate ester [alkyl=(CH2)n, n=1–4] substituent were synthesized using a modified Hantzsch reaction. Compounds having a C‐4 2‐trifluoromethylphenyl (16), 2‐pyridyl (17), or benzofurazan‐4‐yl (20) substituent generally exhibited more potent smooth‐muscle calcium channel antagonist activity (IC50 values in the 0.55 to 38.6 μM range) than related analogs having a C‐4 3‐pyridyl (18), or 4‐pyridyl (19) substituent with IC50 values > 29.91 μM, relative to the reference drug nifedipine (IC50=0.0143 μM). The point of attachment of C‐4 isomeric pyridyl substituents was a determinant of antagonist activity where the relative potency profile was 2‐pyridyl > 3‐pyridyl and 4‐pyridyl. Subgroups of compounds 16a–d, 17a–d, and 20a–d having alkyl spacer groups of variable chain length [–CO2(CH2)nO–, n=1–4] exhibited small differences in calcium channel antagonist potency. Replacement of the ester “methyl” moiety of Bay K 8644 by an O2‐alkyl‐1‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)diazen‐1‐ium‐1,2‐diolate group provided the Bay K 8644 group of analogs 16a‐d that retained the desired cardiac positive inotropic effect. The most potent compound in this group, O2‐ethyl‐1‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)diazen‐1‐ium‐1,2‐diolate 1,4‐dihydro‐2,6‐dimethyl‐3‐nitro‐4‐(2‐trifluoromethylphenyl)pyridine‐5‐carboxylate (16b, EC50=0.096 μM) is about eightfold more potent positive inotrope (cardiac calcium channel agonist) than the reference compound Bay K 8644 (EC50=0.77 μM). A similar replacement of the ester “isopropyl” group in the C‐4 benzofurazan‐4‐yl group of compounds by an O2‐alkyl‐1‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)diazen‐1‐ium‐1,2‐diolate ester substituent provided compounds 20 (n=1 and 4) that were approximately equipotent cardiac positive inotropes with the parent reference compound PN 202‐791 (3, EC50=9.40 μM). The O2‐alkyl‐1‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)diazen‐1‐ium‐1,2‐diolate ester moiety present in 1,4‐dihydropyridine calcium channel modulating compounds 16–20 is not a suitable •NO donor moiety because the percent nitric oxide released upon in vitro incubation with either l‐cysteine, rat serum, or pig liver esterase was less than 1%. Drug Dev. Res. 60:204–216, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Development ResearchSame topicPhenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207