A meta-heuristic approach for solving the no-wait flow-shop problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No-wait flow-shop scheduling problems refer to the set of problems in which a number of jobs are available for processing on a number of machines in a flow-shop context with the added constraint that there should be no waiting time between consecutive operations of the jobs. The problem is strongly NP-hard. In this paper, the considered performance measure is the makespan. In order to explore the feasible region of the problem, a hybrid algorithm of Tabu Search and Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) is proposed. In the proposed approach, PSO algorithm is used in order to move from one solution to a neighbourhood solution. We first employ a new coding and decoding technique to efficiently map the discrete feasible space to the set of integer numbers. The proposed PSO will further use this coding technique to explore the solution space and move from one solution to a neighbourhood solution. Afterwards, the algorithm decodes the solutions to its respective feasible solution in the discrete feasible space and returns the new solutions to the TS. The algorithm is tested by solving a large number of problems available in the literature. Computational results show that the proposed algorithm is able to outperform competitive methods and improves some of the best-known solutions of the considered test problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".