Pathology of an Islet Transplant 2 Years After Transplantation: Evidence for a Nonimmunological Loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We report the immunological and pathological findings of a 52-year-old woman, who died two years after the second of two islet transplants performed using the Edmonton protocol. After each islet transplant, she gradually lost insulin independence while maintaining low levels of C-peptide secretion. METHODS: A complete autopsy was performed including pathological and immunohistochemical analysis of hepatic allogeneic islets and native pancreatic islets to identify rejection or autoimmunity. Elispots assays for allogeneic sensitization and autoantibody assays for autoimmunity were performed antemortem after her islet transplantations to test in vitro for evidence of allogeneic sensitization or autoimmunity. RESULTS: The cause of death was a hypertensive stroke. Small numbers of islets without inflammation were identified within portal venules and stained with insulin. The atrophic pancreas contained small numbers of islets, which stained for insulin, and lacked any inflammation within or adjacent to the islets. In vitro assays for alloantibodies were negative, and Elispots assays failed to identify allogeneic sensitization. In vitro assays for diabetic associated autoantibodies did not identify autoimmune resensitization. The allografted kidney showed only early changes of recurrent diabetic nephropathy, and no evidence of rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, no evidence was found to support an immunological basis (either allo or autoimmunity) for the slow loss of intrahepatic islets, which may, therefore, be related to nonimmunological anatomic and physiological abnormalities of islets infused into the portal veins or to drug toxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".