MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983860818 · doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31828cfb62

Age-related changes in major ovarian follicular wave dynamics during the human menstrual cycle

2013· article· en· W1983860818 on OpenAlex
Heidi Vanden Brink, Donna R. Chizen, Georgina E. Hale, Angela Baerwald

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsFollicular phaseAntral follicleLuteal phaseMedicineMenstrual cycleOvarian follicleOvarian reserveFollicleGynecologyPhysiologyAndrologyInternal medicineHormoneInfertilityPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Changes in antral follicle count, hormone production, and menstrual cyclicity as women age are well documented. However, age-related changes in ovarian follicular wave dynamics in women are not understood. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that major follicular wave dynamics (ie, those in which a dominant follicle develops) differ in women with age. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in 58 women of mid-reproductive age (MRA; 18-35 y; n = 27), late reproductive age (LRA; 36-44 y; n = 10), and advanced reproductive age (ARA; 45-55 y; n = 21). The number and diameters of all follicles ≥ 2 mm were quantified ultrasonographically every 2 to 3 days for one complete interovulatory interval (IOI). Only ovulatory cycles were evaluated. Antral follicle count and major follicular wave dynamics during the IOI were compared among age groups using SPSS version 19.0 (α = 0.05). RESULTS: One (36/58, 62%) or two (22/58, 38%) major follicular waves were observed during the IOI in all women evaluated. The prevalence of follicular-phase dominant follicles (FPDFs) and luteal-phase dominant follicles (LPDFs) was not different among the MRA, LRA, and ARA groups (FPDFs: 27/27 [100%], 10/10 [100%], and 20/21 [95%], respectively; LPDFs: 10/17 [37%], 3/10 [30%], and 10/21 [48%], respectively; P > 0.050). All FPDFs were ovulatory. One LPDF ovulated during menses in the ARA group; all other LPDFs in the MRA, LRA, and ARA groups were anovulatory. On average, LPDFs emerged earlier relative to ovulation (days -6, -2, and -2; P = 0.049), grew longer (11, 3, and 6 d; P = 0.005), and developed to a larger diameter (24, 11, and 11 mm; P = 0.032) in the ARA group versus the MRA and LRA groups. In follicular-phase major waves, there was a tendency for a greater prevalence of polyovulation as women aged (ARA 3/21 [14%] vs MRA 0/27 [0%]; P = 0.070). CONCLUSIONS: One or two major follicular waves develop during the IOI, irrespective of age. The prevalence of LPDFs (range, 30%-50%) and FPDFs (range, 95%-100%) during the IOI does not differ with age. However, the growth dynamics of major waves change as women age. On average, LPDFs emerge earlier, grow for a longer period, and grow to a larger diameter in ovulatory women of advanced versus mid or late reproductive age. There is a greater tendency for polyovulation in the follicular-phase major wave as women age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it