Involvement of the Femoropopliteal Arteries in Giant Cell Arteritis: Clinical and Color Duplex Sonography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent and clinical significance of giant cell arteritis (GCA) of the femoropopliteal arteries. METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical color duplex sonography (CDS) study; 60 of 112 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of GCA underwent complete clinical examination of the lower extremities including the vasculature, systolic ankle pressure measurement, and CDS scans of the femoropopliteal arteries within 1 year after diagnosis of GCA. Circumferential, hypoechogenic, homogenous wall thickening was regarded as a hallmark of femoropopliteal GCA. RESULTS: GCA of femoropopliteal arteries was present in 32 (53.3%) of 60 patients. In general, femoropopliteal GCA developed bilaterally (100%) and 14 patients (23.3%) had significant lower extremity artery obstructions secondary to vasculitis, all leading to symptomatic lower extremity ischemia, with development of critical leg ischemia in 4 patients. Compared with subjects without lower extremity vasculitis, patients with femoropopliteal involvement had a significant time delay until diagnosis (mean 23.9 vs 11.1 weeks; p = 0.03) and a higher frequency of concomitant vasculitis of the arm arteries (74.2% vs 42.9%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Femoropopliteal artery involvement appears to be a clinically relevant manifestation of GCA, frequently leading to symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. CDS of the femoropopliteal arteries is a noninvasive diagnostic tool for detection of lower extremity vasculitis in GCA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".