MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P2-S5.06 Behavioural interventions for reducing HIV infection in workers in occupational settings, a Cochrane systematic review

2011· article· en· W1983985078 on OpenAlexaff
Olumuyiwa Ojo, Jos Verbeek, Kimmo Räsänen, Jeremi Heikkinen, Leena K Isotalo, Nomusa Mngoma, E Ruotsaalainen

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Systematic reviewPsychological interventionCochrane collaborationMeta-analysisMEDLINEFamily medicineInternal medicineNursingCochrane Library

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background HIV in the workforce has a negative impact on economic growth and development of affected countries. The workplace provides an important avenue to prevent HIV by providing easy access to workers who might have similar high risk sexual behaviour because of the nature of their work. Objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effect of behavioural interventions on high risk sexual behaviour to prevent HIV among workers. Methods We searched electronic databases to locate studies. Only randomised control studies in occupational settings or among workers identified as high risk groups were included. The outcome measures were: indicators of high risk sexual behaviours, uptake of Voluntary Counselling and Testing (VCT), and incident cases of HIV. We excluded health workers, sex workers, injection drug users and Men who have sex with men because these are already in other reviews. Results We included 4 studies but we had incomplete data from one. All the studies were from developing countries in Asia and Africa with a total of 7994 participants. We grouped the studies in the following comparisons: Uptake of VCT was increased when provided in workplace compared to voucher for testing only, RR=14.0 (95% CI 11.8 to 16.7), HIV incidence was not reduced, RR=1.4 (95% CI 0.7 to 2.7). Education caused a non-significant decrease in sex with extra partner RR=0.7 (95% CI 0.3 to 1.8) and unprotected sex, RR=0.9 (95% CI 0.5 to 1.4). More intensive Information, motivation and behavioural (IMB) skills training increased the use of condom, RR=2.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 4.1) and decreased sex with commercial sex workers, RR=0.8 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.96) in a very high risk group of truck drivers. Conclusion VCT might not be effective in reducing HIV incidence in workplace intervention, and delivering voluntary counselling and testing on-site at workplace increases the uptake of VCT. However, education, and Information, motivation and behavioural (IMB) skills training might be worthwhile in reducing risky sexual behaviour and increasing condom use, especially when delivered with high intensity in the workplace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicWorkplace Health and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207