Bibliographic record
Abstract
Instability of a liquid jet issuing from an elliptic nozzle in Rayleigh mode is investigated and its behavior is compared with a circular jet. Mathematical solution of viscous free-surface flow for asymmetric geometry is complicated if 3-D analytical solutions are to be obtained. Hence, one-dimensional Cosserat (directed curve) equations are used which can be assumed as a low order form of Navier-Stokes equations for slender jets. Linear solution is performed using perturbation method. Temporal dispersion equation is derived to find the most unstable wavelength responsible for the jet breakup. The obtained results for a circular jet (i.e., an ellipse with an aspect ratio of one) are compared with the classical results of Rayleigh and Weber for inviscid and viscous cases, respectively. It is shown that in the Rayleigh regime, which is the subject of this research, symmetric perturbations are unstable while asymmetric perturbations are stable. Consequently, spatial analysis is performed and the variation of growth rate under the effect of perturbation frequencies for various jet velocities is demonstrated. Results reveal that in comparison with a circular jet, the elliptic jet is more unstable. Furthermore, among liquid jets with elliptical cross sections, those with larger ellipticities have a larger instability growth rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".