MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two-Photon Imaging of Stroke Onset<i>In Vivo</i>Reveals That NMDA-Receptor Independent Ischemic Depolarization Is the Major Cause of Rapid Reversible Damage to Dendrites and Spines

2008· article· en· W1984131513 on OpenAlexafffund
Timothy H. Murphy, Ping Li, K.E. Betts, Richard Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCCanadian Stroke NetworkHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsNMDA receptorDepolarizationCNQXCortical spreading depressionAgonistNeuroscienceDendritic spineIschemiaGlutamate receptorCalcium in biologyBiophysicsChemistryBiologyAMPA receptorCalciumAnesthesiaReceptorMedicineInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We adapt a mouse global ischemia model to permit rapid induction of ischemia and reperfusion in conjunction with two-photon imaging to monitor the initial ionic, structural, and functional implications of brief interruptions of blood flow (6-8 min) in vivo. After only 2-3 min of global ischemia, a wide spread loss of mouse somatosensory cortex apical dendritic structure is initiated during the passage of a propagating wave (3.3 mm/min) of ischemic depolarization. Increases in intracellular calcium levels occurred during the wave of ischemic depolarization and were coincident with the loss of dendritic structure, but were not triggered by reperfusion. To assess the role of NMDA receptors, we locally applied the antagonist MK-801 [(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate] at concentrations sufficient to fully block local NMDA agonist-evoked changes in intracellular calcium levels in vivo. Changes in dendritic structure and intracellular calcium levels were independent of NMDA receptor activation. Local application of the non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist CNQX also failed to block ischemic depolarization or rapid changes in dendrite structure. Within 3-5 min of reperfusion, damage ceased and restoration of synaptic structure occurred over 10-60 min. In contrast to a reperfusion promoting damage, over this time scale, the majority of spines and dendrites regained their original structure during reperfusion. Intrinsic optical signal imaging of sensory evoked maps indicated that reversible alteration in dendritic structure during reperfusion was accompanied by restored functional maps. Our results identify glutamate receptor-independent ischemic depolarization as the major ionic event associated with disruption of synaptic structure during the first few minutes of ischemia in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations267
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207