On the Chemical Reactions of Diphenylamine and its Derivatives with Nitrogen Dioxide at Normal Storage Temperature Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chemical reactions between nitrogen dioxide vapour and diphenylamine (DPA), some of its nitro/nitroso derivatives and between their consecutive products have been studied at temperatures of about 23 °C, whereby cellulose was used as substrate material. The following stabilizer compounds were used as starting components: DPA, N-NO-DPA, 2-NO2-DPA and 4-NO2-DPA. Concentration profiles as function of added nitrogen dioxide have been measured by HPLC. These profiles are similar to the ones obtained by accelerated aging, and the typical consecutive stabilizer products have been formed. The profiles are interpreted in terms of possible reactions. Furthermore, the influences of time and light on the decomposition of the mono-nitro-N-nitroso compounds have been investigated. The consequences of these reactions are discussed to explain differences between the storage aging at ambient temperatures and the higher temperature induced accelerated aging. The reactivity towards nitrogen dioxide for each stabilizer compound was obtained by a kinetic model for the decrease of the starting component.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".