MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The relationship between gonadotrophins, gonadal hormones and bone mass in men

2007· article· en· W1984150458 on OpenAlexaff
N. Karim, D. MacDonald, A. L. Dolan, I. Fogelman, Anthony S. Wierzbicki, Geeta Hampson

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Endocrinology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBone mineralFemoral neckOsteoporosisTestosterone (patch)Body mass indexPopulationHormoneLumbar spineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Inhibin A and B (Inh A and B), activin A (Act A) as well as FSH may play an important role in bone turnover in perimenopausal women. Data in men are lacking. The aim was to investigate the relationship between circulating concentrations of Inh B and Act A and FSH/LH/testosterone (T) and their contribution to bone mineral density (BMD) in a male population. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Cross-sectional case-control study of 156 men, 63 with osteoporosis and 93 controls, aged (mean [SD]) 57.7 [13.7] years. MEASUREMENTS: Areal (aBMD) was measured at the femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine. Volumetric BMD (vBMD) was calculated at the femoral neck and lumbar spine. Risk factors were assessed including the measurement of LH/FSH/T, Inh B and Act A. RESULTS: After correction for age and body mass index (BMI), associations were found between Inh B and FSH (beta regression coefficient beta = -0.326; P < 0.0001), T (beta = -0.36; P = 0.019) and Act A (beta = -0.4; P = 0.007) and between Inh B and LH (beta = 0.23; P < 0.0001) in all patients. The controls had higher Inh B concentrations compared to the cases (Inh B: controls: 139 [86] pg/ml vs. cases 88 [51] pg/ml; P = 0.005). Act A tended to be lower in the controls (Act A: controls 0.63 [0.24] ng/ml vs. cases 0.75 [0.4] ng/ml; P = 0.056). Univariate regression analyses showed a positive association between Inh B and BMD (P < 0.01) at the lumbar spine and total hip. In contrast a negative association was seen between FSH and BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck (P < 0.01). In a partial multivariate regression model that included the gonadal factors only, a positive association was seen between Inh B and BMD at the hip (beta = 0.088; P = 0.04). When all hormones including the gonadotrophins were entered in a full multivariate model, FSH and LH were found to be better predictors of BMD than Inh B or Act A in the controls and cases. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the gonadal peptides and gonadotrophins may play a role in the maintenance of bone mass in men. Future confirmatory longitudinal studies are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical EndocrinologySame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207