MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984173417 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0406333102

Regulation of lck degradation and refractory state in CD8 <sup>+</sup> cytotoxic T lymphocytes

2005· article· en· W1984173417 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Uhlin, Maria G. Masucci, Victor Levitsky

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersKarolinska InstitutetCancerfonden
KeywordsCytotoxic T cellCell biologyCD8ProteasomeCD28ChemistryBiologyCancer researchAntigenImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After specific activation, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) enter a refractory state termed activation-induced nonresponsiveness (AINR) that is characterized by the inability of T cells to respond to a secondary stimulus. Here, we show that T cell receptor triggering results in rapid degradation of the src-family protein kinase lck through a mechanism that is proteasome- and lysosome-independent, sensitive to cysteine protease inhibitors, and distinct from the pathways involved in degradation of ZAP-70 kinase or zeta-chain of the CD3 complex. Pharmacologic blockade of lck degradation, as well as transfection of refractory cells with an lck expression vector, increased responsiveness of CTLs to repeated antigenic challenge. The development or maintenance of AINR was not affected by exogenously added IL-2, whereas IL-15 or IFN-alpha restored both lck expression and responsiveness of preactivated CTLs. Our results suggest that lck degradation plays an important role in the development of AINR in human CTLs and that this condition can be reverted by pharmacologic agents or lymphokines that prevent lck degradation or induce its expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207