Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha and Alpha/Gamma Agonists Do Not Cause Impairment in Renal Function in the Rat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients treated with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor analogs (PPAR) alpha or alpha/gamma may develop a transient and reversible increase in serum creatinine, the mechanism of which remains obscure. This study evaluates whether treatment with either PPAR-alpha or -alpha/gamma analogs, fenofibrate or tesaglitazar, may cause deterioration in renal hemodynamics or exert direct tubular or glomerular nephrotoxic effects in rats. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-320 g) were treated per os with fenofibrate (300 mg/kg/day), tesaglitazar (1.2 mg/kg/day) or vehicle, for 14 days. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow (RBF) were measured by inulin clearance and ultrasonic flowmetry, and cumulative excretion of sodium and creatinine were assessed. Biomarkers of glomerular and tubular injury were measured, including urinary albumin excretion and renal mRNA levels of kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim-1), lipocalin 2 (Lcn2), and osteopontin (Spp1). RESULTS: Fenofibrate and tesaglitazar improved the lipid profile, but caused no detectable decrease in GFR or RBF compared with vehicle-treated rats. Furthermore, the cumulative excretions of sodium and creatinine were not altered by the drugs. Finally, there was no significant difference between drug- and vehicle-treated groups in urinary albumin excretion or in the expression of renal injury biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: In the rat, no direct nephrotoxic effect or deterioration in renal hemodynamics and function were observed following treatment with fenofibrate or tesaglitazar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it