MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W198425145

Assessment of the ototoxicity of docusate sodium (colace) in a guinea pig animal model.

2012· article· en· W198425145 on OpenAlexaff
Nader Emami, Barbara Ng, Michael Roskies, Lana Wazqar, Georges Makhoul, Dan Citra, Sam J. Daniel

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar Surgery and Otitis Media
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOtotoxicityGuinea pigSalineAnimal modelPerforationMyringotomyEar canalAnesthesiaSurgeryMiddle earInternal medicineRadiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Docusate sodium (Colace) is an off-label ceruminolytic agent used to soften ear wax and relieve ear canal obstruction. At present, its effect on hearing in the presence of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation is not clear. The present study aimed to assess the safety of ototopic docusate sodium on hearing in the presence of TM perforation. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial in a guinea pig animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten guinea pigs underwent bilateral myringotomy. In each animal, one ear received docusate sodium, serving as the experimental ear, and the other received normal saline as the control. Auditory brain response (ABR) was performed at baseline and then 1, 7, and 14 days following the application. RESULTS: At day 14 following application, there was no significant change in ABR thresholds at 8, 12, 16, 20, or 25 kHz. CONCLUSION: In guinea pigs with perforated TMs, docusate sodium does not seem to cause ototoxicity. Future clinical studies are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicEar Surgery and Otitis MediaFrench-language works237,207