Development of an Organ Culture System for Long-Term Survival of the Intact Human Intervertebral Disc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Human intervertebral discs were used to develop an intact whole disc organ culture system with long-term cell viability. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a long-term organ culture system for intact human intervertebral discs, in which the potential for biologic repair of disc degeneration can be studied. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intervertebral disc degeneration is a common cause of back pain, which can be costly to the health care system and have a negative impact on the quality of life of the patient. Once injured the adult human intervertebral disc seems incapable of intrinsic repair, but the early stages of disc degeneration can potentially be retarded or even reversed by the administration of growth factors to promote new extracellular matrix synthesis. METHODS: Intervertebral discs were prepared by three isolation techniques and placed in free swelling organ culture. Cell viability, disc swelling, glycosaminoglycan content, and extracellular matrix degradation were assessed under a variety of culture conditions. RESULTS: Human intervertebral discs isolated with intact cartilage end plates retained cell viability and did not undergo matrix degradation when cultured for 4 weeks with both a high and low nutrient level. This contrasted with the excessive cell death that was observed if the cartilage end plates were removed before culture or if vertebral bone was retained. CONCLUSION: Retention of the cartilage end plates limits tissue swelling and permits efficient nutrient supply, thus allowing viable long-term organ culture. The availability of such a system will permit the repair potential of therapeutic candidates to be studied in human discs with naturally occurring degeneration. Furthermore, the system is simple and economical, as no apparatus is needed to limit the detrimental effects of excessive tissue swelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".