Design, Synthesis and Pharmacological Characterization of Endomorphin Analogues with Non‐Cyclic Amino Acid Residues in Position 2
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of endomorphin-1 (EM-1) and endomorphin-2 (EM-2) analogues, containing non-cyclic amino acids (Ala, D-Ala, beta-Ala, NMeAla, D-NMeAla or Sar) instead of Pro in position 2 was synthesized, where NMeAla = N-methylalanine and Sar = N-methylglycine, sarcosine. The opioid activity profiles of these peptides were determined in mu and delta opioid receptor (MOR and DOR)-representative binding assays and bioassays in vitro, as well as in the mouse hot-plate test in vivo. Finally, the degradation rates of all analogues in the presence of either rat brain homogenate or selected proteolytic enzymes were determined. Analogues of EM-2 were generally more potent than the respective analogues of EM-1. EM-2 analogues with D-Ala or D-NMeAla were about twofold more potent than the parent peptide and were least prone to degradation by brain homogenate, dipeptydyl peptidase IV and aminopeptidase M. In the in vivo test, [D-Ala(2)]EM-2 and [D-NMeAla(2)]EM-2 showed much higher analgesic potency than EM-2 which confirmed the usefulness of structural modifications in obtaining new leads for pain-relief therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it