Crystal structure of orthorhombic ferrous nitroprusside: Fe[Fe(CN) <sub>5</sub> NO].2H <sub>2</sub> O
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ferrous nitroprusside can be obtained in three structural modifications: two different unstable phases, monoclinic trihydrate and cubic pentahydrate, and the stable one, an orthorhombic dihydrate. This contribution reports the crystal structure of the last one. Cell parameters are: a =13.9734 (2), b =7.4274 (1), and c =10.4697 (1) Å; with four formula units per cell ( Z =4). The crystal structure was refined from the corresponding XRD powder pattern using the Rietveld method. Final agreement factors of the refinement process were R w p =8.46, R p =6.54, and S =1.38. The crystal structure is formed by a tridimensional assembling of the [Fe(CN) 5 NO] molecular block through iron atoms bounded at the N end of the CN ligands. The NO group remains unlinked at its O atom. The octahedral coordination of the assembling metal is completed with a coordinated water molecule which stabilizes a second water through a strong hydrogen bond interaction. The tridimensional structure appears as piled up rippled sheets leading to a system of interconnected small cavities which increase their available volume on the material dehydration. This complex loses its crystal water below 100 °C and then remains stable up to above 160 °C when the decomposition process begins with the loss of the NO ligand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".