Split Cord Malformation With Diastematomyelia Presenting as Neurogenic Claudication in an Adult
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: This is a report of a rare presentation of a split cord malformation with diastometamyelia. OBJECTIVES: This report draws attention to the fact that the only manifestation of diastmetamyelia in the adult patient may be neurogenic claudication. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with split cord malformations and diastometamyelia rarely have symptomatic onset in adulthood. When present, a traumatic event leading to an acute neurologic change is the usual presentation. METHODS: An adult patient presented with symptoms of neurogenic claudication in the left leg. Magnetic resonance imaging examination showed a split cord malformation and diastometamylia at L3-L4 with spinal stenosis of the left hemicord. Decompressive laminectomy and subtotal resection of the bony spur were performed. RESULTS: Two years after decompression, the patient has complete resolution of his leg symptoms and is back to work. CONCLUSIONS: Neurogenic claudication without any objective neurologic deficit or neurocutaneous stigmas of an underlying spinal cord abnormality may be the only presentation in the adult with diastometamyelia. Decompression to relieve both clinical and radiologic evidence of spinal stenosis obtained excellent outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".