Bioaccumulation and Effects of CdTe/CdS Quantum Dots on <i>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii</i> – Nanoparticles or the Free Ions?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to properly assess the environmental risk of engineered nanoparticles (ENP), it is necessary to determine their fate (including dissolution, aggregation, and bioaccumulation) under representative environmental conditions. CdTe/CdS quantum dots (QD), such as those used in medical imaging, are known to release Cd(2+) due (mainly) to the dissolution of their outer shell. In this study, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was exposed to either a soluble Cd salt or QD at similar concentrations of total Cd. Free Cd concentrations were measured using the Absence of Gradients and Nernstian Equilibrium Stripping technique. QD dissolution increased with decreasing pH and with increasing QD concentration. When exposed to QD, bioaccumulation was largely accounted for by dissolved Cd. Nonetheless, QD were shown to be taken up by the cells and to provoke unique biological effects. Whole transcriptome screening using RNA-Seq analysis showed that the free Cd and the QD had distinctly different biological effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".