Structure of betaglycan zona pellucida (ZP)-C domain provides insights into ZP-mediated protein polymerization and TGF-β binding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The zona pellucida (ZP) domain is a bipartite protein structural element comprised of ZP-N and ZP-C regions. Most notable for its ability to mediate protein polymerization, many ZP proteins polymerize and assemble into long fibrils that form specialized extracellular matrices. Other ZP proteins (namely, betaglycan and endoglin) do not polymerize but serve as important membrane coreceptors for ligands in the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily. Here, we present the 2.0-Å resolution crystal structure of the betaglycan ZP-C region in combination with a downstream region known as the external hydrophobic patch (EHP). Similar to the ZP-N region, the ZP-C region also adopts an immunoglobulin-like fold, despite sharing no sequence homology and possessing different disulfide linkages. The EHP region, which was previously thought to be external to the ZP region, is integral to the ZP-C domain and corresponds to the ZP-C G strand. Our structure also indicates that the critical maturation cleavage of ZP proteins, a process that activates nascent ZP proteins for polymerization, occurs within the immunoglobulin domain at the FG loop. Nonpolymerizing ZP proteins such as betaglycan and endoglin do not contain this cleavage site. Finally, our structure suggests that the AB loop and the convex surface pocket are regions important for TGF-β ligand binding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".