MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984565061 · doi:10.3138/sem.50.2.216

Walking the Corridors of Mass Media: Rolf Dieter Brinkmann’s 1973-1974 Cologne Tape Recordings and the Poetics of Disruption

2014· article· en· W1984565061 on OpenAlex
Kai-Uwe Werbeck

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Cultural Memory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsArtArt historyLiteraturePoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Ich gehe durch lange Massenmedienkorridore,” confesses the German avant-garde poet Rolf Dieter Brinkmann on tape as he walks through Cologne in the winter of 1973–74 (O7). The audibly breathless Brinkmann felt trapped in the city in which he lived, a city chock full of media signals. From 1970 onward, he exposed himself to West Germany’s encroaching “mass-media corridors,” building up his extensive material collections in which he catalogued urban landscapes. Erkundungen fur die Prazisierung des Gefuhls fur einen Aufstand, Rom, Blicke, and Schnitte were published posthumously and are usually referred to as his Materialbande. These literary experiments were supplemented by various other works, among them Brinkmann’s lesser known and only marginally researched Cologne tape recordings. While this sound experiment is an intervention into post-1968 Germany, a time when Brinkmann could no longer overlook “das Scheitern der Studentenbewegung,” he is less interested in political change than a radical rethinking of literature in highly mediated environments (Spath 103). I argue that Brinkmann employs television, a “Medium, alles gleichmachend” and “mittelmasig,” as a counter-example to his own poetics in which the single media channel – be it visual, aural, or textual – carries disruptive potential (O1). Analysing the recordings in great detail, my study focuses on three interrelated key concepts of Brinkmann’s aesthetics: the notion that West Germany’s cities are artificial places, the idea that language is in crisis, and the assumption that mass media play an important role in the policing of everyday life but are at the same time instrumental in the production of a disruptive counter-poetics. In

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it