MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984590918 · doi:10.1139/v10-114

Distribution and reactivity of gallates toward galvinoxyl radicals in SDS micellar solutions — Effect of the alkyl chain length

2011· article· en· W1984590918 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Raquel Bridi, Carolina Aliaga, Alexis Aspée, E. Abuín, E. A. Lissi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
KeywordsChemistryAlkylGallateReaction rate constantMicelleReactivity (psychology)MoietySodium dodecyl sulfateMedicinal chemistryPolymer chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryKineticsAqueous solutionNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we have evaluated the reactivity of methyl gallate, propyl gallate, and n-octyl gallate toward galvinoxyl radicals in homogeneous solution (ethanol) and sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles. In ethanol, the rate of galvinoxyl consumption was independent of the gallate’s alkyl chain length. On the other hand, reaction rates in micelles were dependent on the length of the gallate alkyl chain. Measurements of the rate of the reaction at different pH show that, even at pH 7.0, the reaction mainly involves the monodeprotonated anionic form of the gallates. Plots of reaction rates as a function of the surfactant concentration allowed us to evaluate the distribution of the gallates (K GH ) and an apparent rate constant defined by the product between the intramicellar rate constant of the anion ([Formula: see text]) and its partition constant ([Formula: see text]). The values of the increment of the apparent rate constant per methylene group in the alkyl chain strongly suggest that intramicellar rate constant values are independent of the alkyl chain length. This points to a similar intramicellar localization of the phenolate moiety in the three gallates considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207