Time Scales in Polymer Modified Asphalts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Historically, Maxwell was probably the first one who recognized the importance of time scales for understanding the mechanical response of asphalt. In instantaneous response asphalt behaves as an elastic, solid‐like material, on the other hand its long time response is that of a viscous, fluid‐like material. In the linear viscoelastic region asphalt behaves as a low molecular weight polymer. However, in the nonlinear region of high strains or rates of strain the behavior of some asphaltic systems can be rather complicated. In asphalts, asphaltenes, resins and alkanes compose a complex colloidal system, in which alkanes act as a solvent, asphaltenes as micelles and the polar resins as stabilizers. In order to enhance the mechanical properties of asphalts they are frequently modified by blending them with appropriate polymers. Changes in the impermanent network that can be formed in some of these blends can lead to an unexpected behavior of the steady shear viscosity function. Several different time scales emerge from this behavior. A possible relation of these “nonlinear” time scales to the linear viscoelastic time scales is discussed and examples of anomalous behavior of polymer‐modified asphalts are given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".