Bronchiolitis Obliterans Organizing Pneumonia After Bone Marrow Transplantation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) appearances of bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). METHODS: The HRCT scans obtained in 4 patients (2 men and 2 women, age range: 20-50 years, mean age = 36 years) with biopsy-proven BOOP after BMT were reviewed retrospectively by 2 observers for the presence, extent, and distribution of parenchymal abnormalities. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated consolidation and ground-glass opacity. The consolidation was bilateral, patchy, and asymmetric in all patients and was predominantly peribronchovascular in 3 patients and subpleural and peribronchovascular in 1 patient. Ground-glass opacity was patchy and asymmetric in all patients and was bilateral in 3 patients and unilateral in 1 patient. No zonal predominance of either feature could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: The predominant HRCT features of BOOP after BMT are bilateral, patchy, and asymmetric consolidation in a predominantly peribronchovascular distribution with associated ground-glass opacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it