Gait Changes Following Botulinum Toxin A Treatment in Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of botulinum toxin A treatment of spastic plantar flexors in stroke on joint mobility and gait kinematics and kinetics. METHOD: Nine patients with hemiparetic stroke presenting with ankle hypertonicity participated in this exploratory open-label case series study. Comprehensive gait analysis provided bilateral kinematic and kinetic information for the ankle, knee, and hip joints throughout the stance phase. Data were obtained at baseline, 2 weeks, and 10 weeks post botulinum toxin injection of the spastic plantar flexors. RESULTS: Passive ankle range of motion increased post injection (p < .05). The amount of plantarflexion in late stance was significantly reduced (p < .05) while the maximum dorsiflexion increased in midstance at 10 weeks post treatment. The angular displacement profiles for the knee revealed that patients tended to display less hyperextension following treatment (p = .053). No significant changes in kinetic measures were found; however, case-by-case observations suggested that most patients experienced improvements in positive work production. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that botulinum toxin treatment results in improved joint mobility and ankle kinematics and, in some patients, increases in positive work, suggesting better gait performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".