MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1984765153 · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.047

Paper #43: Consistency Of Reported Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Management Of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review

2013· review· en· W1984765153 on OpenAlexaff
Olufemi R. Ayeni, Bandar Hetaimish, Moin Khan, Sarah Crouch, Mohit Bhandari

Bibliographic record

VenueArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersHospital for Special Surgery
KeywordsFemoroacetabular impingementMedicineArthroscopyConsistency (knowledge bases)Physical therapySurgeryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is great variation in reported clinical and radiographic outcomes following arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study highlights the need for consistent outcome reporting following arthroscopic FAI surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.192
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.192
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.008
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
DomainReporting
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery→Same topicHip disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→