Characterization of the biologically important interaction between troponin C and the N‐terminal region of troponin I
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The N-terminal regulatory region of Troponin I, residues 1-40 (TnI 1-40, regulatory peptide) has been shown to have a biologically important function in the interactions of troponin I and troponin C. Truncated analogs corresponding to shorter versions of the N-terminal region (1-30, 1-28, 1-26) were synthesized by solid-phase methodology. Our results indicate that residues 1-30 of TnI comprises the minimum sequence to retain full biological activity as measured in the acto-S1-TM ATPase assay. Binding of the TnI N-terminal regulatory peptides (TnI 1-30 and the N-terminal regulatory peptide (residues 1-40) labeled with the photoprobe benzoylbenzoyl group, BBRp) were studied by gel electrophoresis and photochemical cross-linking experiments under various conditions. Fluorescence titrations of TnI 1-30 were carried out with TnC mutants that carry a single tryptophan fluorescence probe in either the N- or C-domain (F105W, F105W/C domain (88-162), F29W and F29W/N domain (1-90)) (Fig. 1). Low Kd values (Kd < 10(-7) M) were obtained for the interaction of F105W and F105W/C domain (88-162) with TnI 1-30. However, there was no observable change in fluorescence when the fluorescence probe was located at the N-domain of the TnC mutant (F29W and F29W/N domain (1-90)). These results show that the regulatory peptide binds strongly to the C-terminal domain of TnC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".