MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984771546 · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0777

Inner and Outer Annulus Fibrosus Cells Exhibit Differentiated Phenotypes and Yield Changes in Extracellular Matrix Protein Composition <i>In Vitro</i> on a Polycarbonate Urethane Scaffold

2014· article· en· W1984771546 on OpenAlexafffund
Jonathan Iu, J. Paul Santerre, Rita A. Kandel

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering Part A · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsExtracellular matrixIntervertebral discTissue engineeringCell biologyChemistryScaffoldDecellularizationIn vitroAnnulus (botany)Matrix (chemical analysis)Matrix metalloproteinaseBiomedical engineeringAnatomyBiologyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since there is currently no optimal treatment for chronic neck or back pain that restores full spine functionality and disc height, recent research has focused on developing a regenerative medicine approach. This requires a better understanding of the phenotype nature of the different cell types present in disc tissues. In particular, there is very little known about the differentiated states of cells that co-exist within the annulus fibrosus (AF), despite the critical importance of this tissue in maintaining disc functionality. Maintenance of the differentiated states of these AF cells is imperative to the production of appropriate extracellular matrix (ECM) macromolecules and to the engineering of functional AF tissues. The objective of this study was to determine whether inner annulus fibrosus (IAF) cells when grown on polycarbonate urethane (PU) scaffolds in vitro will produce ECM molecules characteristic of IAF cells and different from outer annulus fibrosus (OAF) cells. OAF and IAF cells isolated from bovine coccygeal intervertebral disc were grown on nanofibrous PU for approximately 14 days. The effect of culture time on ECM gene expression, DNA content, and the synthesis and retention of proteoglycans and collagens were evaluated for both OAF and IAF cells. The ECM accumulated was also characterized by immunostaining and Western blot. The tensile strengths of the tissue/scaffolds were evaluated at 14 days. Both OAF and IAF cells both attached to PU and had similar DNA contents over time. IAF cells maintained relatively higher levels of COL2A1, ACAN and VCAN gene expression, and relatively lower levels of COL1A1 gene expression when compared with OAF cells, by 10 days of culture. IAF cells synthesized and retained similar amounts of total collagen and proteoglycans when compared with OAF cells. While both OAF and IAF cells accumulated type I collagen, only IAF cells accumulated type II collagen. Both cell types accumulated similar amounts of aggrecan but IAF cells accumulated higher amounts of versican as determined by immunostaining. In conclusion, nanofibrous PU scaffolds enabled the maintenance of most of the characteristic features of the IAF cell phenotype, and were different from those of OAF cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTissue Engineering Part ASame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207