Multifractal imaging filtering and decomposition methods in space, Fourier frequency, and eigen domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The patterns shown on two-dimensional images (fields) used in geosciences reflect the end products of geo-processes that occurred on the surface and in the subsurface of the Earth. Anisotropy of these types of patterns can provide information useful for interpretation of geo-processes and identification of features in the mapped area. Quantification of the anisotropy property is therefore essential for image processing and interpretation. This paper introduces several techniques newly developed on the basis of multifractal modeling in space, Fourier frequency, and eigen domains, respectively. A singularity analysis method implemented in the space domain can be used to quantify the intensity and anisotropy of local singularities. The second method, called S-A, characterizes the generalized scale invariance property of a field in the Fourier frequency domain. The third method characterizes the field using a power-law model on the basis of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the field. The applications of these methods are demonstrated with a case study of Environment Scan Electric Microscope (ESEM) microimages for identification of sphalerite (ZnS) ore minerals from the Jinding Pb/Zn/Ag mineral deposit in Shangjiang District, Yunnan Province, China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".