MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984834548 · doi:10.1118/1.4774053

Position sensitive measurement of lithium traces in brain tissue with neutrons

2013· article· en· W1984834548 on OpenAlexaff
Josef Lichtinger, R. Gernhäuser, Andreas Bauer, Michael Bendel, L. Canella, Matthias Graw, R. Krücken, P. Kudějová, Elisabeth Mützel, Susanne Ring‐Dimitriou, D. Seiler, S. Winkler, K. Zeitelhack, J. Schöpfer

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCalifornia Department of Fish and Game
KeywordsNeutronPosition (finance)Lithium (medication)Nuclear medicineDosimetryPhysicsMedical physicsNuclear physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceRadiochemistryOpticsMedicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The application of lithium is well known to have an antimanic-depressive effect, however, the influence it has on the human brain is still insufficiently known. The aim of our work is to develop a method to investigate the lithium concentration in the human brain with a very high sensitivity and a submillimeter resolution. Present methods either do not provide spatial resolution or are not sensitive enough to measure the naturally occurring lithium content in the human brain. Our method provides the opportunity to perform postmortem series measurements and obtain a detailed map of the lithium distribution in the human brain. This way possible correlations of the lithium distribution in the human brain and biological reasons for affective disorder can be clarified. METHODS: To study the lithium distribution in different regions of the human brain the authors developed a method to measure lithium traces postmortem with a submillimeter spatial resolution using the neutron capture reaction (6)Li(n, α)(3)H. The lithium is measured by coincident detection of the alpha particles and tritons, emitted in opposite directions. The general concept, the preparation of the brain samples, the experimental setup at the measurement station of the Forschungs-Neutronenquelle Heinz Maier-Leibnitz, and a first measurement on human brain tissue are presented. RESULTS: A first measurement on a brain tissue sample nicely showed a spatial distribution of lithium down to a few hundreds of pg∕cm(3) with a maximal resolution of about σ(x) = σ(y) ≈ 200 μm. Also a direct correlation of lithium and optical tissue structure is observable. Typical measurement times of a few minutes allow for series measurements of up to 20 × 20 mm(2) large samples with a thickness of w = 10-20 μm in medical studies. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a very high lithium sensitivity with position resolving measurement makes this method well suited for postmortem studies of the microscopic lithium distribution in the human brain and thus to form a microscopic picture of the impact of lithium in different areas of the human brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207