MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE-INDUCED GRANULOMA AND BRAINSTEM CYST AFTER MICROVASCULAR DECOMPRESSION FOR TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA

2007· article· en· W1984867452 on OpenAlexaff
Gábor G. Tóth, Helene Rubeiz, R. Loch Macdonald

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersActelion Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsMedicineMicrovascular decompressionTrigeminal neuralgiaOmmaya reservoirSurgeryDecompressionCystCraniotomyPolytetrafluoroethyleneTrigeminal nerveCerebellopontine angleRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Microvascular decompression is commonly performed for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. A piece of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is usually placed between the trigeminal nerve and the blood vessel causing the compression. The procedure is effective and relatively safe, and PTFE is presumed to be inert. Reactions to PTFE are rare. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We report a patient who developed progressive neurological symptoms 5 years after microvascular decompression surgery. Imaging showed an enhancing cerebellopontine mass resembling a posterior fossa tumor with a large cyst compressing the brainstem. INTERVENTION: Craniotomy was performed to decompress the cyst. Biopsy of the enhancing mass showed granulomatous inflammation. The patient underwent a second brainstem decompression surgery with placement of a catheter in the cyst connected to an Ommaya reservoir; she has moderate to severe residual neurological deficits. CONCLUSION: This may be the first case of a severely disabling, space-occupying cyst resulting from a reaction to intracranial PTFE. Should this exceptionally rare complication be disclosed to patients or is it an idiosyncratic reaction unlikely to occur again?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicTrigeminal Neuralgia and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207