MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Doubling Calcium and Phosphate Concentrations in Neonatal Parenteral Nutrition Solutions Using Monobasic Potassium Phosphate

2006· article· en· W1984872670 on OpenAlexaff
Joyce C. Wong, Albert R. McDougal, Marianne Tofan, Jasvinder Aulakh, Marjolan Pineault, Philippe Chessex

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Nutrition · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonobasic acidPhosphateCalciumPotassium phosphatePotassiumParenteral nutritionChemistryInternal medicineBiochemistryEndocrinologyMedicineChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Premature infants require high intakes of Ca and P to mimic fetal accretion rates. With the current phosphate salt used, adequate amounts cannot be provided due to the precipitation of Ca and P in TPN solutions. OBJECTIVE: To compare monobasic potassium phosphate (monobasic regimen) and monobasic plus dibasic potassium phosphate (dibasic regimen) on calcium phosphate solubility in 5 amino acid products, and to determine whether solubility differences observed in these products can be explained by buffering capacity. METHODS: TPN solutions were prepared according to standard clinical practice. The following amino acid products were used at 3% concentrations: Primene, Vamin N, TrophAmine, Aminosyn-PF, and Travasol. Dextrose 10%, standard electrolytes, heparin, vitamins and trace elements were added. Calcium (as gluconate) and phosphate (as monobasic or dibasic regimen) were added in one-to-one molar ratios from 0-45 mmol/L. Solutions were inspected macroscopically and microscopically for precipitation under three conditions: immediately, 24 h after preparation at room temperature, and 3 h later in a 37 degrees C water bath. Buffering capacity was determined for each amino acid product by titrating with standardized 0.1 M NaOH. RESULTS: Variations in Ca:P solubility and buffer capacity exist between amino acid solutions. With Primene and Vamin no macroscopic or microscopic precipitation was detected up to 45 mmol/L using monobasic regimen, compared to 25 mmol/L using dibasic regimen with Trophamine. Buffer capacity did not account for the solubility differences observed between the five amino acid products, which were related to the pH of the final solution. CONCLUSIONS: These data will allow clinicians to double the current concentrations of calcium and phosphate in neonatal TPN solutions using monobasic regimen. Although this is particularly relevant to situations when fluid intake is restricted, the effect of the acid load needs to be investigated in extremely low birth weight infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of NutritionSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207