Coordinated active/reactive power control for flicker mitigation in distributed wind power
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flicker mitigation in variable-speed wind generators can be approached by reactive power control utilizing the power-electronic converter of the machine, a technique that is bound by several factors including the network X/R ratio, line current limits and the instantaneous output of the machine. The highest flicker level is observed as the machine approaches its rated output, under such conditions in sites with favorable wind resource, sole reactive power compensation would necessitate overrated operation for long periods and increased line currents or otherwise the reactive power margin narrows possibly resulting in impaired capability in reducing flicker to compatible levels. This paper proposes coordinated power curtailment and reactive power control and assesses the feasibility of its implementation in reducing variable-speed wind generators flicker emission under high wind speed conditions. The amount of active power to be curtailed is quantified based on the observed decrease in short-term flicker Pst with respect to power factor settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it