Recombinant inbreeding in mice reveals thresholds in embryonic corpus callosum development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inbred strains BALB/cWah1 and 129P1/ReJ both show incomplete penetrance for absent corpus callosum (CC); about 14% of adult mice have no CC at all. Their F(1) hybrid offspring are normal, which proves that the strains differ at two or more loci pertinent to absent CC. Twenty-three recombinant inbred lines were bred from the F(2) cross of BALB/c and 129, and several of these expressed a novel and severe phenotype after only three or four generations of inbreeding - total absence of the CC and severe reduction of the hippocampal commissure (HC) in every adult animal. As inbreeding progressed, intermediate sizes of the CC and the HC remained quite rare. This striking phenotypic distribution in adults arose from developmental thresholds in the embryo. CC axons normally cross to the opposite hemisphere via a tissue bridge in the septal region at midline, where the HC forms before CC axons arrive. The primary defect in callosal agenesis in the BALB/c and 129 strains is severe retardation of fusion of the hemispheres in the septal region, and failure to form a CC is secondary to this defect. The putative CC axons arrive at midline at the correct time and place in all groups, but in certain genotypes, the bridge is not yet present. The relative timing of axon growth and delay of the septal bridge create a narrow critical period for forming a normal brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".