Aminostratigraphie des formations littorales pléistocènes et holocènes de la région de Casablanca, Maroc / Aminostratigraphy of Pleistocene and Holoceme littoral deposits in the Casablanca region, Morocco.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Casablanca region, the regional uplift and climatic conditions which favour rapid consolidation of littoral deposits have favored the preservation of ancient shorelines and their faunas, since at least the end of the Miocene. The species Patella intermedia, present in almost all Middle and Upper Pleistocene formations, exhibits a relatively rapid rate of epimensation because of regional temperatures. This allows us to establish an aminostratigraphic framework for the Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts of Morocco up until isotopic stage 9. The D-AIle/L-Ile ratios of total ammo acids associated with the Holocene and Soltaman (stages 2 to 4) deposits yield the linear portion of the regional epimensation curve. This gives us an opening for dating Upper Pleistocene and Holocene archaeological sites. Three older groups can be clearly distinguished : aminogroup O (Ouljian) attnbuted to isotopic stage 5 (shoreline between 0 and 6 m), the infrequent Bir Feghloul aminogroup (shoreline near 8 m), attributed to stage 7, and aminogroup OAJ (Oulad Aj Jmel, shoreline between 9 et 12 m) attnbuted to stage 9 Beyond stage 9, Patella intermedia underwent a marked degradation expressed by a significant decrease in ammo acid concentration and scattered D-AIle/L-Ile ratios. These two characteristics allow us to recognize a pre- OAJ aminogroup
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".