Distribution of carbohydrate during grainfill in Leafy and normal maize hybrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Leafy (Lfy) genotype in corn has extra leaves above the ear in comparison to normal non-leafy genotypes and has been shown to increase yields in some geographical areas. In this study, carbohydrate distribution in three Lfy hybrids (two of which were "staygreen") and a normal check (Pioneer 3790) were analyzed in a short-season area (2800 Crop Heat Units, suitable for 85 day Relative Maturity hybrids). Total sugar and starch were determined at all aboveground levels of leaf and stem on 1 August 1990 and this distribution was used to calculate total canopy carbohydrates in two subsequent years from samplings of leaf and stem at only three or four canopy levels bracketing the ear level. Husk, cob and kernel components were also analyzed at three sampling times during grainfill. Major differences in the 2 yr were observed, but in general there was approximately twice the carbohydrate in the canopy at and above the ear in the Lfy genotypes compared to the check. There was also more carbohydrate in the husk and cob in the Lfy lines, but substantially less carbohydrate below the ear in these lines. Rates of grainfill were generally higher in the Lfy hybrids, but the rate of Lfy hybrid A, the early senescent hybrid, was slower in the cooler growing season. Despite the greater amount of carbohydrate in the Lfy hybrids in comparison to the traditional check, their grain yields were not greatly increased, indicating that the kernel component provided a weak sink. This characteristic is probably associated with the long season and tropical origin of the Lfy germplasm. Key words: Maize, grainfill, leafy, carbohydrate distribution, phenology, sink size
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".