"What revels are in hand?": A Change of Direction at the Stratford Shakespeare Festival of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the Stratford Festival of Canada, the years 1994 to 2007 were largely defined by the figure of artistic director Richard Monette, whose ambitious seasons performed spectacularly at the box office but whose populist showmanship stirred debates about the aesthetic appropriate for a classical theater company. This article assesses Monette's artistic directorship and considers the future of what the new leadership has rebranded the Stratford Shakespeare Festival. It modifies the view that Monette was a populist who privileged the box office over artistic integrity, stressing instead the aesthetic diversity of Monette's Festival. It examines, too, how Monette responded to criticism by increasing the diversity of his casting and programming. The article further explores the intentions and the spectacular disintegration of the three-person directorate appointed to replace Monette and it considers the early decisions of the sole remaining artistic director, Des McAnuff. While the demise of the group leadership model reduces the likelihood of truly radical change, the article suggests that McAnuff will nonetheless make a difference, especially in pursuing more dynamic approaches to directing Shakespeare and structural changes to the revolutionary Festival Stage. The article argues that even as Stratford moves forward, Monette's tenure remains a major context for understanding the fraught transition that followed him and the ongoing changes that seek to redefine the Festival as a state-of-the-art theater for the twenty-first century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".