MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985113830 · doi:10.1089/cmb.2007.0147

Discovering High-Order Patterns of Gene Expression Levels

2008· article· en· W1985113830 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew K. C. Wong, Wai-Ho Au, Keith C. C. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene expressionGeneBiologyGene clusterPair-rule geneGeneticsComputational biologyExpression (computer science)Regulation of gene expressionGene expression profilingRegulator geneComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports the discovery of statistically significant association patterns of gene expression levels from microarray data. By association patterns, we mean certain gene expression intensity intervals having statistically significant associations among themselves and with the tissue classes, such as cancerous and normal tissues. We describe how the significance of the associations among gene expression levels can be evaluated using a statistical measure in an objective manner. If an association is found to be significant based on the measure, we say that it is statistically significant. Given a gene expression data set, we first cluster the entire gene pool comprising all the genes into groups by optimizing the correlation (or more precisely, interdependence) among the gene expression levels within gene groups. From each group, we select one or several genes that are most correlated with other genes within that group to form a smaller gene pool. This gene pool then constitutes the most representative genes from the original pool. Our pattern discovery algorithm is then used, for the first time, to discover the significant association patterns of gene expression levels among the genes from the small pool. With our method, it is more effective to discover and express the associations in terms of their intensity intervals. Hence, we discretize each gene expression levels into intervals maximizing the interdependence between the gene expression and the tissue classes. From this data set of gene expression intervals, we discover the association patterns representing statistically significant associations, some positively and some negatively, with different tissue classes. We apply our pattern discovery methodology to the colon-cancer microarray gene expression data set. It consists of 2000 genes and 62 samples taken from colon cancer or normal subjects. The statistically significant combinations of gene expression levels that repress or activate colon cancer are revealed in the colon-cancer data set. The discovered association patterns are ranked according to their statistical significance and displayed for interpretation and further analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational BiologySame topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207