MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Challenges in Health State Valuation in Paediatric Economic Evaluation

2011· article· en· W1985149660 on OpenAlexafffund
Wendy J. Ungar

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacoEconomics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of Toronto
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsHealth economicsPreferenceValuation (finance)Health Utilities IndexEconomic evaluationProxy (statistics)MedicineHealth administrationQuality-adjusted life yearCost–utility analysisHealth careEQ-5DActuarial sciencePublic economicsPublic healthCost effectivenessEconomicsRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceEconomic growthNursingMicroeconomicsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.213
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.451
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2130.451
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.012
Scholarly communication0.0190.018
Open science0.0060.007
Research integrity0.0080.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.687
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePharmacoEconomicsSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207