MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985164178 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v5n4p90

Extraction of Several Divalent Metal Picrates by 18-Crown-6 Ether Derivatives into Benzene: A Refinement of Methods for Analyzing Extraction Equilibria

2013· article· en· W1985164178 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yoshihiro Kudo, Yuu Takahashi, Shoichi Katsuta, Yasuyuki Takeda

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryExtraction (chemistry)Aqueous solutionPicrateCrown etherAqueous two-phase systemStability constants of complexesEtherBenzeneDivalentInorganic chemistryEquilibrium constantPhase (matter)Ionic strengthIonic bondingIonPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three kinds of extraction constants, Kex, Kex±, and Kex+, were evaluated from the improved model that the following three component-equilibria were added to a previously-proposed model for an overall extraction: M2+ + A-===MA+, MLA+Bz + A-Bz===MLA2,Bz, and A-===A-Bz. Here, Kex, Kex±, and Kex+ were defined as [MLA2]Bz/([M2+][L]Bz[A-]2), [MLA+]Bz[A-]Bz/([M2+][L]Bz[A-]2), and [MLA+]Bz/([M2+][L]Bz[A-]), respectively; the subscript “Bz” denotes benzene as an organic phase. The symbols correspond to M2+ = Ca2+ and Pb2+, L = 18-crown-6 ether (18C6) and dibenzo-18C6 (DB18C6), and A- = picrate ion. The ion-pair formation constant for M2+ + A-===MA+ at M2+ = Pb2+ in an aqueous phase was also determined at 298 K and ionic strength of zero by an extraction of HA into 1,2-dichloroethane and Bz with the presence of Pb2+ in the aqueous phase. The Kex values re-evaluated from the present model were in agreement with those determined by the previous extraction model. Individual distribution constants of A- into Bz were almost constant irrespective of kinds of M2+ and L employed. Furthermore, the composition-determination method of the ion pairs, MLA2, extracted into Bz was re-examined. Similar analyses were performed in the SrA2-, BaA2-18C6, and SrA2-DB18C6 systems without considering the formation of MA+ in the aqueous phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207