MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985269720 · doi:10.1116/1.1472423

Amorphous silicon nitride deposited at 120 °C for organic light emitting display-thin film transistor arrays on plastic substrates

2002· article· en· W1985269720 on OpenAlexafffund
D Stryahilev, Andrei Sazonov, Arokia Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsMaterials scienceThin-film transistorAmorphous solidOptoelectronicsSilicon nitrideSubthreshold slopeDielectricChemical vapor depositionActive matrixThin filmAmorphous siliconNitrideTransistorPlasma-enhanced chemical vapor depositionSiliconThreshold voltageNanotechnologyCrystalline siliconVoltageElectrical engineeringCrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogen-rich amorphous silicon nitride (a-SiNx:H) films with [N]/[Si] ratios ranging from 1.4 to 1.7 were deposited by a 13.56 MHz plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition method at a temperature of 120 °C. The films’ composition, dielectric constant, electrical resistivity, and breakdown voltage were evaluated. The electrical properties of a-SiNx:H films with a [N]/[Si] ratio of more than 1.6 are superior to their lower N-content counterparts. Amorphous silicon thin film transistors (TFTs) that incorporate a-SiNx:H dielectrics were fabricated on glass and plastic substrates at a maximum processing temperature of 120 °C. The TFTs exhibit effective field effect mobility of 0.5–0.8 cm2/V s, an ON current of ∼10−5 A, an ON/OFF ratio of more than 106 and a subthreshold slope of 0.5 V/dec. The performance of the transistors seems to be compatible with application of them in active–matrix organic light emitting displays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and FilmsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207