Invasive Pneumococcal Infections in Canadian Children, 1991-1998: Implications for New Vaccination Strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We reviewed 2040 consecutive cases of invasive pneumococcal infection that were seen at 11 pediatric centers across Canada during 1991-1998 to determine if such infections could be prevented by new conjugate vaccines. Isolates from 1528 cases were serotyped. Most cases (61.5%) occurred in patients aged >2 years. Underlying medical conditions were present in 23.2% of case patients. Serotypes in the 7-valent conjugate vaccine matched isolates as follows: 85.8% of tested isolates from children aged 6 months to 5 years, but significantly fewer isolates in younger and older children; 72.9% of isolates from non-healthy children, but 83.9% of isolates from previously healthy children; and 95.4% of isolates with high-level penicillin resistance, but only 72.7% of those with intermediate-level resistance. Significant natural variation in the proportion of isolates matching 7-valent vaccines occurred from year to year and among centers. New conjugate vaccines have great potential but their effectiveness and limitations require ongoing study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".