Bone Repair Stimulation in Rat Mandible by New Chitosan Silver(I) Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two new chitosan silver(I) complexes, [Ag(2CS)(H2O)(NO3)] and [Ag(2CS)(ahmp)(H2O)] (CS = chitosan, Hahmp = 4-amino-6-hydroxy-2-mercaptopyrimidine) were synthesized and characterized on the basis of elemental analysis, spectral (FT-IR and solid-state 13C-NMR), morphological (SEM, matrix analysis, XRD, and XRPE), and thermal measurements. Chitosan behaves as a neutral ligand, coordinates Ag(I) through half of amino nitrogen centers, with the pendant glucose amine hydroxy functionality playing no role in coordination, while 4-amino-6-hydroxy-2-mercaptopyrimidine functions as mononegative bidentate, chelating through the deprotonated cyclic nitrogen and thione sulfur atoms. [Ag(2CS)(ahmp)(H2O)] displays a significant potential bone regenerator in rat mandible. Forty male rats were divided into two groups: bone defect (control) and bone defect with [Ag(2CS)(ahmp)(H2O)] (treated). The bone defects were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and Masson's trichrome for histological analysis. The treated group shows faster and well organized bone formation in the defect in comparison to the control group which shows little new bone trabeculae and wide marrow cavities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".