Influence of ration level and rearing temperature on hepatic GHR1 and 2, and hepatic and intestinal TRα and TRβ gene expression in late stages of rainbow trout embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study examined whether the early life‐history temperature experience of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss embryos affects subsequent growth and expression of growth‐related genes in the growing‐up juveniles in response to variations in ration levels. Embryos were reared in a Heath incubator at either 8·5° C (E8·5) or 6·0° C (E6·0) until hatching, at which time they were transferred to grow‐up tanks supplied with water at 8·5° C. At swim‐up, the late stage embryos were subsequently fed a salmonid starter diet at levels of 5, 2 or 0·5% of live body mass per day. The body mass and proximate composition of the juveniles was examined when yolk absorbance was complete (21 days after the fish commenced feeding). Quantitative RT‐PCR was used to examine the expression of mRNA encoding for growth hormone receptors 1 and 2 (GHR1 and GHR2) in the liver, and the two isoforms of thyroid hormone receptor (TRα and TRβ) in the liver and intestinal tract. Final body mass and total length, liver and intestinal masses, and total lipid content of the E8·5 treatment group were directly related to increased ration size. These variables in the E6·0 treatment group fed the 5% ration were significantly lower than for the comparable E8·5 treatment group, suggesting an effect of embryo rearing temperature on the subsequent growth of these late stage embryos as they undergo the transition from embryo to early juvenile. Intestinal TRα and TRβ mRNA abundance was directly related to ration size in the E8·5 treatment group, but not in the E6·0 treatment group. Conversely, hepatic TRα and TRβ mRNA abundance was significantly affected by ration size only in the E6·0 group, with TRβ and TRα abundance showing direct and inverse relationships with ration size, respectively. Hepatic GHR1 mRNA abundance was significantly and directly related to ration size in both the E8·5 and E6·0 treatment groups, but there were no differences in the abundance of hepatic GHR2 mRNA among any treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".