The influence of clear-cutting on ectomycorrhizal fungus diversity in a lodgepole pine (<i>Pinus contorta</i>) stand, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, and Gallatin National Forest, Montana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects of clear-cutting on the ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungus community in a Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. forest near Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, U.S.A., were assessed using molecular techniques. Samples were taken by soil core in both undisturbed and clear-cut sites by randomized block design. Species overlap was compared between clear-cut and undisturbed sites and ascomycete-basidiomycete ratio was determined, using PCR-RFLP methods. Fifty species of EM fungi were detected in the clear-cut sites, the most common being Cenococcum geophilum Fr., Suillus sp., a member of the suilloid group, a Russulaceae species, and a Thelephoraceae species. Sixty-six species were detected in the undisturbed sites, which were dominated by a Suilloid species, a Tricholomataceae species, Cortinarius sp., and Cenococcum geophilum. Species composition in the clear-cut sites differed significantly from that in the undisturbed sites (P = 0.0001). However, 9 of the 14 species most commonly found in the clear-cut sites were also found in the undisturbed sites, but in much lower abundance, while species rank curves of both stand types mirrored each other. There were no significant differences in species richness, root-tip abundance, or ascomycete-basidiomycete ratio between the clear-cut and undisturbed sites. However, species richness was lower in the clear-cut sites than in the undisturbed sites. An overall loss of species richness after clear-cutting and significant changes in species composition indicate that clear-cutting can negatively alter the EM fungal community, and this may have profound effects on ecosystem function.Key words: ectomycorrhizae, community structure, clear-cutting, molecular techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".