Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of IVIG-SN in patients with primary immunodeficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: IVIG-SN is a modern intravenous immunoglobulin with multiple pathogen elimination steps. This clinical trial in patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of this product in adults and children. Methods: Forty-four patients with PID were treated with IVIG-SN for 12 months. IgG trough levels and pharmacokinetics of IVIG-SN were evaluated as well as efficacy and safety according to standard FDA guidelines. Results: Overall, a total of 572 IVIG-SN infusions were administered according to either a 21- or a 28-day schedule. IgG trough levels during the treatment period ranged from 823.00 to 902.77 mg/dL, respectively, and half-life in serum of the administered IgG was 43.45 ± 30.25 days. There were no deaths and no adverse events leading to withdrawal from the study. Of all infusions administered, only 137 (24%) were temporally associated with an adverse event (AE). The upper bound for the 95% CI for the frequency of infusions temporally associated with an AE was 29.2%. Drug-related AEs were predominantly mild, and there were no acute serious bacterial infections during the study. Efficacy was also demonstrated by low rates of missed work, school, or daycare days (mean 2.6 days); unscheduled visits to physicians (mean 1.7); and therapeutic antibiotic use (mean 15 days). Conclusion: IVIG-SN is effective in preventing infections and is safe and well tolerated. Statement of novelty: This efficacy and toxicity trial was conducted using a new IVIG preparation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".